Paperback: 152 pages
Publisher: Oxford University Press; 1 edition (September 25, 2003)
Language: English
ISBN-10: 0192803433
ISBN-13: 978-0192803436
Product Dimensions: 6.9 x 0.5 x 4.4 inches
Shipping Weight: 5 ounces (View shipping rates and policies)
Average Customer Review: 3.3 out of 5 stars See all reviews (6 customer reviews)
Best Sellers Rank: #480,335 in Books (See Top 100 in Books) #140 in Books > History > Ancient Civilizations > Prehistory #315 in Books > Textbooks > Social Sciences > Archaeology #772 in Books > Textbooks > Humanities > History > Ancient
The author being a museum curator, it is not surprising that he concentrates on physical artifacts and the ways in which early humans used them to relate to their environment and each other. His main thesis is that our relationship with objects, and the way we relate to other humans by use of objects (trading, giving, repaying, etc) is what defines us as humans and is the central dynamic of cultural evolution. He also claims that this intimate relationship with objects has been the evolutionary driving force behind human intelligence. Indeed, he attempts a new definition of intelligence which has little to do with intellectual ability as normally perceived but has to do with our interaction with the physical world around us. This is no doubt politically correct and allows us to describe the most moronic athletes as geniuses, but it leaves us with no definition of intellect, so we are back where we started. Are we to reserve judgement on Einstein's intellectual abilities until we know if he could kick a ball straight? I won't even ask about Stephen Hawking.Where many researchers would emphasize language as being central to what makes us human and what enables us to evolve sophisticated cultures, Gosden always comes back to objects. He does mention language. In describing the Sapir-Whorf hypothesis he acknowledges that it is 'controversial within linguistics', but then goes on to talk of it as if it were proven fact. I thought it had been thoroughly discredited long ago. But for the most part, language is ignored in favor of objects. Of course, this is understandable in someone who spends his time sifting through pieces of flint rather than poring over ancient manuscripts. I cannot blame him for ignoring literary evidence when prehistory, by definition, has none.
Prehistory: A Very Short Introduction Computer Science: A Very Short Introduction (Very Short Introductions) Documentary Film: A Very Short Introduction (Very Short Introductions) Human Rights: A Very Short Introduction (Very Short Introductions) Colonial America: A Very Short Introduction (Very Short Introductions) American History: A Very Short Introduction (Very Short Introductions) Law: A Very Short Introduction (Very Short Introductions) The Tudors: A Very Short Introduction (Very Short Introductions) The Vikings: A Very Short Introduction (Very Short Introductions) Philosophy of Law: A Very Short Introduction (Very Short Introductions) The Palestinian-Israeli Conflict: A Very Short Introduction (Very Short Introductions) Ancient Assyria: A Very Short Introduction (Very Short Introductions) The Napoleonic Wars: A Very Short Introduction (Very Short Introductions) History: A Very Short Introduction (Very Short Introductions) American Immigration: A Very Short Introduction (Very Short Introductions) Crime Fiction: A Very Short Introduction (Very Short Introductions) The Beats: A Very Short Introduction (Very Short Introductions) Modernism: A Very Short Introduction (Very Short Introductions) Dada and Surrealism: A Very Short Introduction (Very Short Introductions) German Literature: A Very Short Introduction (Very Short Introductions)