Paperback: 352 pages
Publisher: Simon & Schuster; Reprint edition (April 19, 2011)
Language: English
ISBN-10: 1416541632
ISBN-13: 978-1416541639
Product Dimensions: 5.5 x 0.8 x 8.4 inches
Shipping Weight: 11.2 ounces (View shipping rates and policies)
Average Customer Review: 3.9 out of 5 stars See all reviews (84 customer reviews)
Best Sellers Rank: #105,162 in Books (See Top 100 in Books) #74 in Books > Literature & Fiction > British & Irish > Shakespeare > Literary Criticism #130 in Books > Literature & Fiction > History & Criticism > Regional & Cultural > European > British & Irish #170 in Books > Reference > Writing, Research & Publishing Guides > Publishing & Books > Authorship
I'd always ignored the so-called Shakespeare authorship question, because I think it's irrelevant. I don't care who wrote Shakespeare's plays, because it's the plays that count, not the man. But I decided to read James Shapiro's Contested Will out of curiosity about how the theory that Shakespeare didn't write Shakespeare took hold.It so happens that I'm familiar with a lot of the backstory - the rise of biblical criticism and the questioning of who Homer was - that serve as a foundation to the earliest anti-Stratfordian theories. It's easy to understand how, in the early 19th century, people who felt this approach so important could be convinced that another great author was not who he seemed. But as time went by, this became a story of lies, deceit and forgery, as well as convoluted conspiracy theories.Deep down, it seems that there are two essential elements that come into play. The first is that, according to skeptics, there is no way the son of a glover could have written so eloquently about so many things. His limited education could not have enabled him to write such profound plays. As if in the nature vs. nurture argument, only nurture counts. This has been proven wrong with many artists, musicians and authors who came from humble beginnings, so it seems like a moot point, and surprises me that so many people bring up this point to deny Shakespeare's legitimacy.The second element is the belief, which became prevalent in the romantic period, that all art is personal; that art reflects personal experiences. If this is the case, the skeptics say, then Shakespeare, who never visited Italy, could not have written about Italy. This argument seems childish to me; could a writer who has never visited Mars write about that planet?
There is something about Shakespeare scholarship which engenders greatness: Greenblatt, Kermode, Wells, Shapiro, Bate, Bloom--these are not dry scholars, but deep thinkers, writers of powerful prose, all with a profound sense of life in other times. None of them believes that someone other than Shakespeare wrote Shakespeare's works.But there is a long tradition that Francis Bacon or Edward deVere (or many others) wrote Shakespeare's works, and that somehow generations of scholars have been fooled. Why anyone would think anything so preposterous on the face of it, has always interested me. I once put it down to snobbery, that the son of a glove-maker from Stratford could not have been smart enough to write such plays.But it is more complicated than this. Shapiro's main idea is that many people want to believe that such great writing has to be based on experience, and Shakespeare could not have had the experiences which led to the poems and plays.Shapiro is a scholar of Shakespeare, but in this book he had to treat many times and subjects, from 19th century positivism to Freud, and had to try to explain why such great thinkers as Mark Twain, Henry James and Sigmund Freud believed that someone else wrote Shakespeare. Surprisingly, Shapiro is respectful of what others would call lunacy. To explain one phase of the movement, which purported to find hidden codes in the plays, he explains how the development the telegraph and Morse code infused the culture of the times.Shakespeare's poetry is of such extraordinary depth and beauty that it seems that it could only have been written by a man of letters, not an actor.
Contested Will: Who Wrote Shakespeare? I Wrote This Crap For You Banjo Paterson - The Man Who Wrote Waltzing Matilda: His Life and Poetry My Dad Wrote a Porno: The Fully Annotated Edition of Rocky Flintstone's Belinda Blinked Today I Wrote Nothing: The Selected Writings of Daniil Kharms Words I Wish I Wrote: A Collection of Writing That Inspired My Ideas I Am Incomplete Without You: An Interactive Poetry Journal from the Author of I Wrote This For You Contested Embrace: Transborder Membership Politics in Twentieth-Century Korea (Studies of the Walter H. Shorenstein Asi) Contested Secessions Rights, Self-determination, Democracy, and Kashmir Contested Lives: The Abortion Debate in an American Community, Updated edition Taiwans China Dilemma: Contested Identities and Multiple Interests in Taiwans Cross-Strait Economic Policy Contested Lands: Israel-Palestine, Kashmir, Bosnia, Cyprus, and Sri Lanka Contested Federalism: Certainty and Ambiguity in the Canadian Federation Burroughs Wellcome in the USA and the Wellcome Trust: Pharmaceutical Innovation, Contested Organizational Cultures and the triumph of philanthropy. Confucianism as a World Religion: Contested Histories and Contemporary Realities Shakespeare in the Movies: From the Silent Era to Shakespeare in Love (Literary Artist's Representatives) Shakespeare and Modern Popular Culture (Oxford Shakespeare Topics) Romeo and Juliet: Oxford School Shakespeare (Oxford School Shakespeare Series) Spark Notes No Fear Shakespeare Othello (SparkNotes No Fear Shakespeare) Will in the World: How Shakespeare Became Shakespeare